Archives For IPOL 8574 Intro to WMD Nonproliferation

Introduction

If there is one country that bears responsibility for both nuclear proliferation and nonproliferation, it is the United States. The United States let the nuclear genie out of the bottle when it built nuclear weapons and detonated them over Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Now, the United States is trying to coax the genie back into the bottle. Or is it? On one hand, the United States is doing its part to stem the tide of proliferation at home and abroad. On the other hand, the United States often lacks the political will to carry out its nonproliferation intentions. This paper will examine United States successes and failures in nonproliferation to explain how the United States exemplifies both the strengths and weaknesses of international efforts to control the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The United States has made significant gestures toward nonproliferation but has had poor follow through due to lack of political will.

This paper will examine United States nonproliferation successes and failures in six key areas: nuclear testing, nuclear arms reductions, reliance on nuclear weapons, fissile material reduction, nuclear security, and nonproliferation regime compliance. Each of these areas will demonstrate strengths and weaknesses in United States nonproliferation efforts and the underlying lack of political will.

Continue Reading…

Introduction

Is there one nonproliferation regime among the four (nuclear, chemical, biological, or missile) that has been more successful in reaching the goal of universal compliance? If so, why, in comparison to the other nonproliferation regimes, has it been the most effective and what aspects of it have contributed to its effectiveness? In contrast to the other three nonproliferation regimes, what are the normative and legal basis of this regime that distinguish it from the others? To what does this nonproliferation regime owe the effectiveness of the mechanisms established to implement its compliance verification efforts in contrast with the other three regimes?

All four of the nonproliferation regimes (nuclear, chemical, biological, or missile) have faced noncompliance challenges, verification challenges, normative challenges, and legal challenges. Each of the nonproliferation regimes has demonstrated successes and failures and/or strengths and weakness in the face of each of these challenges. Nevertheless, one of the nonproliferation regimes stands out from the other three. The nuclear nonproliferation regime has been the most successful of the four nonproliferation regimes in reaching the goal of universal compliance.

Continue Reading…